Preguntas etiquetadas con ranks

15
La precisión de la máquina de aumento de gradiente disminuye a medida que aumenta el número de iteraciones

Estoy experimentando con el algoritmo de la máquina de aumento de gradiente a través del caretpaquete en R. Usando un pequeño conjunto de datos de admisión a la universidad, ejecuté el siguiente código: library(caret) ### Load admissions dataset. ### mydata <-

machine-learning caret boosting gbm hypothesis-testing t-test panel-data psychometrics intraclass-correlation generalized-linear-model categorical-data binomial model intercept causality cross-correlation distributions ranks p-value z-test sign-test time-series references terminology cross-correlation definition probability distributions beta-distribution inverse-gamma missing-data paired-comparisons paired-data clustered-standard-errors cluster-sample time-series arima logistic binary-data odds-ratio medicine hypothesis-testing wilcoxon-mann-whitney unsupervised-learning hierarchical-clustering neural-networks train clustering k-means regression ordinal-data change-scores machine-learning experiment-design roc precision-recall auc stata multilevel-analysis regression fitting nonlinear jmp r data-visualization gam gamm4 r lme4-nlme many-categories regression causality instrumental-variables endogeneity controlling-for-a-variable
14
Caret glmnet vs cv.glmnet

Parece haber mucha confusión en la comparación de usar glmnetdentro caretpara buscar una lambda óptima y usar cv.glmnetpara hacer la misma tarea. Se plantearon muchas preguntas, por ejemplo: Modelo de clasificación train.glmnet vs. cv.glmnet? ¿Cuál es la forma correcta de usar glmnet con...

r caret glmnet machine-learning neural-networks maximum softmax probability distributions mathematical-statistics random-variable cdf statistical-significance variance expected-value ratio sample-size reliability tolerance-interval wilcoxon-signed-rank self-study variance sampling mean machine-learning svm libsvm self-study sampling ranks data-visualization histogram machine-learning classification normal-distribution mathematical-statistics maximum-likelihood mixture predictive-models prediction seasonality
12
¿Cómo realizar la imputación de valores en una gran cantidad de puntos de datos?

Tengo un conjunto de datos muy grande y faltan alrededor del 5% de valores aleatorios. Estas variables están correlacionadas entre sí. El siguiente conjunto de datos R de ejemplo es solo un ejemplo de juguete con datos correlacionados ficticios. set.seed(123) # matrix of X variable xmat <-...

r random-forest missing-data data-imputation multiple-imputation large-data definition moving-window self-study categorical-data econometrics standard-error regression-coefficients normal-distribution pdf lognormal regression python scikit-learn interpolation r self-study poisson-distribution chi-squared matlab matrix r modeling multinomial mlogit choice monte-carlo indicator-function r aic garch likelihood r regression repeated-measures simulation multilevel-analysis chi-squared expected-value multinomial yates-correction classification regression self-study repeated-measures references residuals confidence-interval bootstrap normality-assumption resampling entropy cauchy clustering k-means r clustering categorical-data continuous-data r hypothesis-testing nonparametric probability bayesian pdf distributions exponential repeated-measures random-effects-model non-independent regression error regression-to-the-mean correlation group-differences post-hoc neural-networks r time-series t-test p-value normalization probability moments mgf time-series model seasonality r anova generalized-linear-model proportion percentage nonparametric ranks weighted-regression variogram classification neural-networks fuzzy variance dimensionality-reduction confidence-interval proportion z-test r self-study pdf
10
¿Por qué Anova () y drop1 () proporcionaron diferentes respuestas para GLMM?

Tengo un GLMM de la forma: lmer(present? ~ factor1 + factor2 + continuous + factor1*continuous + (1 | factor3), family=binomial) Cuando lo uso drop1(model, test="Chi"), obtengo resultados diferentes a los que uso Anova(model, type="III")del paquete del automóvil o summary(model). Estos dos...

r anova glmm r mixed-model bootstrap sample-size cross-validation roc auc sampling stratification random-allocation logistic stata interpretation proportion r regression multiple-regression linear-model lm r cross-validation cart rpart logistic generalized-linear-model econometrics experiment-design causality instrumental-variables random-allocation predictive-models data-mining estimation contingency-tables epidemiology standard-deviation mean ancova psychology statistical-significance cross-validation synthetic-data poisson-distribution negative-binomial bioinformatics sequence-analysis distributions binomial classification k-means distance unsupervised-learning euclidean correlation chi-squared spearman-rho forecasting excel exponential-smoothing binomial sample-size r change-point wilcoxon-signed-rank ranks clustering matlab covariance covariance-matrix normal-distribution simulation random-generation bivariate standardization confounding z-statistic forecasting arima minitab poisson-distribution negative-binomial poisson-regression overdispersion probability self-study markov-process estimation maximum-likelihood classification pca group-differences chi-squared survival missing-data contingency-tables anova proportion