Preguntas etiquetadas con exponential-smoothing

78
Un ejemplo: regresión LASSO usando glmnet para el resultado binario

Estoy empezando a incursionar con el uso de glmnetla LASSO regresión donde mi resultado de interés es dicotómica. He creado un pequeño marco de datos simulados a continuación: age <- c(4, 8, 7, 12, 6, 9, 10, 14, 7) gender <- c(1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0) bmi_p <- c(0.86, 0.45, 0.99, 0.84,...

r self-study lasso regression interpretation anova statistical-significance survey conditional-probability independence naive-bayes graphical-model r time-series forecasting arima r forecasting exponential-smoothing bootstrap outliers r regression poisson-distribution zero-inflation genetic-algorithms machine-learning feature-selection cart categorical-data interpretation descriptive-statistics variance multivariate-analysis covariance-matrix r data-visualization generalized-linear-model binomial proportion pca matlab svd time-series correlation spss arima chi-squared curve-fitting text-mining zipf probability categorical-data distance group-differences bhattacharyya regression variance mean data-visualization variance clustering r standard-error association-measure somers-d normal-distribution integral numerical-integration bayesian clustering python pymc nonparametric-bayes machine-learning svm kernel-trick hyperparameter poisson-distribution mean continuous-data univariate missing-data dag python likelihood dirichlet-distribution r anova hypothesis-testing statistical-significance p-value rating data-imputation censoring threshold
11
Utilice Holt-Winters o ARIMA?

Mi pregunta es sobre la diferencia conceptual entre Holt-Winters y ARIMA. Por lo que yo entiendo, Holt-Winters es un caso especial de ARIMA. Pero, ¿cuándo se prefiere un algoritmo sobre el otro? ¿Quizás Holt-Winters es incremental y, por lo tanto, sirve como un algoritmo en línea (más...

time-series arima exponential-smoothing
10
¿Por qué Anova () y drop1 () proporcionaron diferentes respuestas para GLMM?

Tengo un GLMM de la forma: lmer(present? ~ factor1 + factor2 + continuous + factor1*continuous + (1 | factor3), family=binomial) Cuando lo uso drop1(model, test="Chi"), obtengo resultados diferentes a los que uso Anova(model, type="III")del paquete del automóvil o summary(model). Estos dos...

r anova glmm r mixed-model bootstrap sample-size cross-validation roc auc sampling stratification random-allocation logistic stata interpretation proportion r regression multiple-regression linear-model lm r cross-validation cart rpart logistic generalized-linear-model econometrics experiment-design causality instrumental-variables random-allocation predictive-models data-mining estimation contingency-tables epidemiology standard-deviation mean ancova psychology statistical-significance cross-validation synthetic-data poisson-distribution negative-binomial bioinformatics sequence-analysis distributions binomial classification k-means distance unsupervised-learning euclidean correlation chi-squared spearman-rho forecasting excel exponential-smoothing binomial sample-size r change-point wilcoxon-signed-rank ranks clustering matlab covariance covariance-matrix normal-distribution simulation random-generation bivariate standardization confounding z-statistic forecasting arima minitab poisson-distribution negative-binomial poisson-regression overdispersion probability self-study markov-process estimation maximum-likelihood classification pca group-differences chi-squared survival missing-data contingency-tables anova proportion