Preguntas etiquetadas con z-statistic

55
Prueba de Wald para regresión logística

Hasta donde yo entiendo, la prueba de Wald en el contexto de la regresión logística se usa para determinar si cierta variable predictora es significativa o no. Rechaza la hipótesis nula de que el coeficiente correspondiente sea cero.XXX La prueba consiste en dividir el valor del coeficiente por...

logistic z-statistic
20
¿Cuáles son los valores correctos para precisión y recuperación en casos extremos?

La precisión se define como: p = true positives / (true positives + false positives) ¿Es cierto que, como true positivesy false positivesenfoque 0, la precisión se aproxima a 1? La misma pregunta para recordar: r = true positives / (true positives + false negatives) Actualmente estoy...

precision-recall data-visualization logarithm references r networks data-visualization standard-deviation probability binomial negative-binomial r categorical-data aggregation plyr survival python regression r t-test bayesian logistic data-transformation confidence-interval t-test interpretation distributions data-visualization pca genetics r finance maximum probability standard-deviation probability r information-theory references computational-statistics computing references engineering-statistics t-test hypothesis-testing independence definition r censoring negative-binomial poisson-distribution variance mixed-model correlation intraclass-correlation aggregation interpretation effect-size hypothesis-testing goodness-of-fit normality-assumption small-sample distributions regression normality-assumption t-test anova confidence-interval z-statistic finance hypothesis-testing mean model-selection information-geometry bayesian frequentist terminology type-i-and-ii-errors cross-validation smoothing splines data-transformation normality-assumption variance-stabilizing r spss stata python correlation logistic logit link-function regression predictor pca factor-analysis r bayesian maximum-likelihood mcmc conditional-probability statistical-significance chi-squared proportion estimation error shrinkage application steins-phenomenon
10
¿Por qué Anova () y drop1 () proporcionaron diferentes respuestas para GLMM?

Tengo un GLMM de la forma: lmer(present? ~ factor1 + factor2 + continuous + factor1*continuous + (1 | factor3), family=binomial) Cuando lo uso drop1(model, test="Chi"), obtengo resultados diferentes a los que uso Anova(model, type="III")del paquete del automóvil o summary(model). Estos dos...

r anova glmm r mixed-model bootstrap sample-size cross-validation roc auc sampling stratification random-allocation logistic stata interpretation proportion r regression multiple-regression linear-model lm r cross-validation cart rpart logistic generalized-linear-model econometrics experiment-design causality instrumental-variables random-allocation predictive-models data-mining estimation contingency-tables epidemiology standard-deviation mean ancova psychology statistical-significance cross-validation synthetic-data poisson-distribution negative-binomial bioinformatics sequence-analysis distributions binomial classification k-means distance unsupervised-learning euclidean correlation chi-squared spearman-rho forecasting excel exponential-smoothing binomial sample-size r change-point wilcoxon-signed-rank ranks clustering matlab covariance covariance-matrix normal-distribution simulation random-generation bivariate standardization confounding z-statistic forecasting arima minitab poisson-distribution negative-binomial poisson-regression overdispersion probability self-study markov-process estimation maximum-likelihood classification pca group-differences chi-squared survival missing-data contingency-tables anova proportion