n-gramos en pitón, cuatro, cinco, seis gramos?

Estoy buscando una manera de dividir un texto en n-gramas. Normalmente haría algo como:

import nltk
from nltk import bigrams
string = "I really like python, it's pretty awesome."
string_bigrams = bigrams(string)
print string_bigrams

Soy consciente de que nltk solo ofrece bigrams y trigrams, pero ¿hay alguna forma de dividir mi texto en cuatro gramos, cinco gramos o incluso cien gramos?

¡Gracias!

Excelentes respuestas basadas en Python nativas dadas por otros usuarios. Pero aquí está el nltkenfoque (por si acaso, el OP se penaliza por reinventar lo que ya existe en la nltkbiblioteca).

Hay un módulo ngram que la gente rara vez usa nltk. No es porque sea difícil de leer ngrams, sino entrenar una base de modelo en ngrams donde n> 3 dará como resultado mucha escasez de datos.

from nltk import ngrams

sentence = 'this is a foo bar sentences and i want to ngramize it'

n = 6
sixgrams = ngrams(sentence.split(), n)

for grams in sixgrams:
  print grams

Me sorprende que esto aún no se haya presentado:

In [34]: sentence = "I really like python, it's pretty awesome.".split()

In [35]: N = 4

In [36]: grams = [sentence[i:i+N] for i in xrange(len(sentence)-N+1)]

In [37]: for gram in grams: print gram
['I', 'really', 'like', 'python,']
['really', 'like', 'python,', "it's"]
['like', 'python,', "it's", 'pretty']
['python,', "it's", 'pretty', 'awesome.']

Usando solo herramientas nltk

from nltk.tokenize import word_tokenize
from nltk.util import ngrams

def get_ngrams(text, n ):
    n_grams = ngrams(word_tokenize(text), n)
    return [ ' '.join(grams) for grams in n_grams]

Salida de ejemplo

get_ngrams('This is the simplest text i could think of', 3 )

['This is the', 'is the simplest', 'the simplest text', 'simplest text i', 'text i could', 'i could think', 'could think of']

Para mantener los ngrams en formato de matriz simplemente elimine ' '.join

Aquí hay otra forma simple de hacer n-gramos

>>> from nltk.util import ngrams
>>> text = "I am aware that nltk only offers bigrams and trigrams, but is there a way to split my text in four-grams, five-grams or even hundred-grams"
>>> tokenize = nltk.word_tokenize(text)
>>> tokenize
['I', 'am', 'aware', 'that', 'nltk', 'only', 'offers', 'bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams', ',', 'but', 'is', 'there', 'a', 'way', 'to', 'split', 'my', 'text', 'in', 'four-grams', ',', 'five-grams', 'or', 'even', 'hundred-grams']
>>> bigrams = ngrams(tokenize,2)
>>> bigrams
[('I', 'am'), ('am', 'aware'), ('aware', 'that'), ('that', 'nltk'), ('nltk', 'only'), ('only', 'offers'), ('offers', 'bigrams'), ('bigrams', 'and'), ('and', 'trigrams'), ('trigrams', ','), (',', 'but'), ('but', 'is'), ('is', 'there'), ('there', 'a'), ('a', 'way'), ('way', 'to'), ('to', 'split'), ('split', 'my'), ('my', 'text'), ('text', 'in'), ('in', 'four-grams'), ('four-grams', ','), (',', 'five-grams'), ('five-grams', 'or'), ('or', 'even'), ('even', 'hundred-grams')]
>>> trigrams=ngrams(tokenize,3)
>>> trigrams
[('I', 'am', 'aware'), ('am', 'aware', 'that'), ('aware', 'that', 'nltk'), ('that', 'nltk', 'only'), ('nltk', 'only', 'offers'), ('only', 'offers', 'bigrams'), ('offers', 'bigrams', 'and'), ('bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams'), ('and', 'trigrams', ','), ('trigrams', ',', 'but'), (',', 'but', 'is'), ('but', 'is', 'there'), ('is', 'there', 'a'), ('there', 'a', 'way'), ('a', 'way', 'to'), ('way', 'to', 'split'), ('to', 'split', 'my'), ('split', 'my', 'text'), ('my', 'text', 'in'), ('text', 'in', 'four-grams'), ('in', 'four-grams', ','), ('four-grams', ',', 'five-grams'), (',', 'five-grams', 'or'), ('five-grams', 'or', 'even'), ('or', 'even', 'hundred-grams')]
>>> fourgrams=ngrams(tokenize,4)
>>> fourgrams
[('I', 'am', 'aware', 'that'), ('am', 'aware', 'that', 'nltk'), ('aware', 'that', 'nltk', 'only'), ('that', 'nltk', 'only', 'offers'), ('nltk', 'only', 'offers', 'bigrams'), ('only', 'offers', 'bigrams', 'and'), ('offers', 'bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams'), ('bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams', ','), ('and', 'trigrams', ',', 'but'), ('trigrams', ',', 'but', 'is'), (',', 'but', 'is', 'there'), ('but', 'is', 'there', 'a'), ('is', 'there', 'a', 'way'), ('there', 'a', 'way', 'to'), ('a', 'way', 'to', 'split'), ('way', 'to', 'split', 'my'), ('to', 'split', 'my', 'text'), ('split', 'my', 'text', 'in'), ('my', 'text', 'in', 'four-grams'), ('text', 'in', 'four-grams', ','), ('in', 'four-grams', ',', 'five-grams'), ('four-grams', ',', 'five-grams', 'or'), (',', 'five-grams', 'or', 'even'), ('five-grams', 'or', 'even', 'hundred-grams')]

La gente ya ha respondido bastante bien para el escenario en el que necesita bigramas o trigramas, pero si necesita cada gramo para la oración en ese caso, puede usarnltk.util.everygrams

>>> from nltk.util import everygrams

>>> message = "who let the dogs out"

>>> msg_split = message.split()

>>> list(everygrams(msg_split))
[('who',), ('let',), ('the',), ('dogs',), ('out',), ('who', 'let'), ('let', 'the'), ('the', 'dogs'), ('dogs', 'out'), ('who', 'let', 'the'), ('let', 'the', 'dogs'), ('the', 'dogs', 'out'), ('who', 'let', 'the', 'dogs'), ('let', 'the', 'dogs', 'out'), ('who', 'let', 'the', 'dogs', 'out')]

En caso de que tenga un límite, como en el caso de los trigramas donde la longitud máxima debe ser 3, puede usar max_len param para especificarlo.

>>> list(everygrams(msg_split, max_len=2))
[('who',), ('let',), ('the',), ('dogs',), ('out',), ('who', 'let'), ('let', 'the'), ('the', 'dogs'), ('dogs', 'out')]

Puede modificar el parámetro max_len para lograr cualquier gramo, es decir, cuatro gramos, cinco gramos, seis o incluso cien gramos.

Las soluciones mencionadas anteriormente se pueden modificar para implementar la solución mencionada anteriormente, pero esta solución es mucho más sencilla que eso.

Para leer más, haga clic aquí

Y cuando solo necesita un gramo específico como bigram o trigram, etc., puede usar nltk.util.ngrams como se menciona en la respuesta de MAHassan.

Puede preparar fácilmente su propia función para hacer esto usando itertools:

from itertools import izip, islice, tee
s = 'spam and eggs'
N = 3
trigrams = izip(*(islice(seq, index, None) for index, seq in enumerate(tee(s, N))))
list(trigrams)
# [('s', 'p', 'a'), ('p', 'a', 'm'), ('a', 'm', ' '),
# ('m', ' ', 'a'), (' ', 'a', 'n'), ('a', 'n', 'd'),
# ('n', 'd', ' '), ('d', ' ', 'e'), (' ', 'e', 'g'),
# ('e', 'g', 'g'), ('g', 'g', 's')]

Un enfoque más elegante para construir bigrams con la construcción incorporada de Python zip(). Simplemente convierta la cadena original en una lista split(), luego pase la lista una vez normalmente y una vez desplazada por un elemento.

string = "I really like python, it's pretty awesome."

def find_bigrams(s):
    input_list = s.split(" ")
    return zip(input_list, input_list[1:])

def find_ngrams(s, n):
  input_list = s.split(" ")
  return zip(*[input_list[i:] for i in range(n)])

find_bigrams(string)

[('I', 'really'), ('really', 'like'), ('like', 'python,'), ('python,', "it's"), ("it's", 'pretty'), ('pretty', 'awesome.')]

Nunca he tratado con nltk pero hice N-gramos como parte de algún proyecto de clase pequeña. Si desea encontrar la frecuencia de todos los N-gramos que ocurren en la cadena, aquí hay una manera de hacerlo. Dte daría el histograma de tus N palabras.

D = dict()
string = 'whatever string...'
strparts = string.split()
for i in range(len(strparts)-N): # N-grams
    try:
        D[tuple(strparts[i:i+N])] += 1
    except:
        D[tuple(strparts[i:i+N])] = 1

Para four_grams ya está en NLTK , aquí hay un fragmento de código que puede ayudarlo a lograrlo:

 from nltk.collocations import *
 import nltk
 #You should tokenize your text
 text = "I do not like green eggs and ham, I do not like them Sam I am!"
 tokens = nltk.wordpunct_tokenize(text)
 fourgrams=nltk.collocations.QuadgramCollocationFinder.from_words(tokens)
 for fourgram, freq in fourgrams.ngram_fd.items():  
       print fourgram, freq

Espero que ayude.

Puede usar sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer :

import sklearn.feature_extraction.text # FYI http://scikit-learn.org/stable/install.html
ngram_size = 4
string = ["I really like python, it's pretty awesome."]
vect = sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer(ngram_range=(ngram_size,ngram_size))
vect.fit(string)
print('{1}-grams: {0}'.format(vect.get_feature_names(), ngram_size))

salidas:

4-grams: [u'like python it pretty', u'python it pretty awesome', u'really like python it']

Puede establecer ngram_sizeen cualquier número entero positivo. Es decir, puede dividir un texto en cuatro gramos, cinco gramos o incluso cien gramos.

Si la eficiencia es un problema y tiene que construir varios n-gramas diferentes (hasta cien como usted dice), pero desea utilizar Python puro, lo haría:

from itertools import chain

def n_grams(seq, n=1):
    """Returns an itirator over the n-grams given a listTokens"""
    shiftToken = lambda i: (el for j,el in enumerate(seq) if j>=i)
    shiftedTokens = (shiftToken(i) for i in range(n))
    tupleNGrams = zip(*shiftedTokens)
    return tupleNGrams # if join in generator : (" ".join(i) for i in tupleNGrams)

def range_ngrams(listTokens, ngramRange=(1,2)):
    """Returns an itirator over all n-grams for n in range(ngramRange) given a listTokens."""
    return chain(*(n_grams(listTokens, i) for i in range(*ngramRange)))

Uso:

>>> input_list = input_list = 'test the ngrams generator'.split()
>>> list(range_ngrams(input_list, ngramRange=(1,3)))
[('test',), ('the',), ('ngrams',), ('generator',), ('test', 'the'), ('the', 'ngrams'), ('ngrams', 'generator'), ('test', 'the', 'ngrams'), ('the', 'ngrams', 'generator')]

~ Misma velocidad que NLTK:

import nltk
%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=5)
# 7.02 ms ± 79 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
n_grams(input_list,n=5)
# 7.01 ms ± 103 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=1)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=2)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=3)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=4)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=5)
# 7.32 ms ± 241 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
range_ngrams(input_list, ngramRange=(1,6))
# 7.13 ms ± 165 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

Repost de mi respuesta anterior .

Nltk es genial, pero a veces es una sobrecarga para algunos proyectos:

import re
def tokenize(text, ngrams=1):
    text = re.sub(r'[\b\(\)\\\"\'\/\[\]\s+\,\.:\?;]', ' ', text)
    text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text)
    tokens = text.split()
    return [tuple(tokens[i:i+ngrams]) for i in xrange(len(tokens)-ngrams+1)]

Ejemplo de uso:

>> text = "This is an example text"
>> tokenize(text, 2)
[('This', 'is'), ('is', 'an'), ('an', 'example'), ('example', 'text')]
>> tokenize(text, 3)
[('This', 'is', 'an'), ('is', 'an', 'example'), ('an', 'example', 'text')]

Puede obtener todos los 4-6 gramos usando el código sin otro paquete a continuación:

from itertools import chain

def get_m_2_ngrams(input_list, min, max):
    for s in chain(*[get_ngrams(input_list, k) for k in range(min, max+1)]):
        yield ' '.join(s)

def get_ngrams(input_list, n):
    return zip(*[input_list[i:] for i in range(n)])

if __name__ == '__main__':
    input_list = ['I', 'am', 'aware', 'that', 'nltk', 'only', 'offers', 'bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams', ',', 'but', 'is', 'there', 'a', 'way', 'to', 'split', 'my', 'text', 'in', 'four-grams', ',', 'five-grams', 'or', 'even', 'hundred-grams']
    for s in get_m_2_ngrams(input_list, 4, 6):
        print(s)

la salida está debajo:

I am aware that
am aware that nltk
aware that nltk only
that nltk only offers
nltk only offers bigrams
only offers bigrams and
offers bigrams and trigrams
bigrams and trigrams ,
and trigrams , but
trigrams , but is
, but is there
but is there a
is there a way
there a way to
a way to split
way to split my
to split my text
split my text in
my text in four-grams
text in four-grams ,
in four-grams , five-grams
four-grams , five-grams or
, five-grams or even
five-grams or even hundred-grams
I am aware that nltk
am aware that nltk only
aware that nltk only offers
that nltk only offers bigrams
nltk only offers bigrams and
only offers bigrams and trigrams
offers bigrams and trigrams ,
bigrams and trigrams , but
and trigrams , but is
trigrams , but is there
, but is there a
but is there a way
is there a way to
there a way to split
a way to split my
way to split my text
to split my text in
split my text in four-grams
my text in four-grams ,
text in four-grams , five-grams
in four-grams , five-grams or
four-grams , five-grams or even
, five-grams or even hundred-grams
I am aware that nltk only
am aware that nltk only offers
aware that nltk only offers bigrams
that nltk only offers bigrams and
nltk only offers bigrams and trigrams
only offers bigrams and trigrams ,
offers bigrams and trigrams , but
bigrams and trigrams , but is
and trigrams , but is there
trigrams , but is there a
, but is there a way
but is there a way to
is there a way to split
there a way to split my
a way to split my text
way to split my text in
to split my text in four-grams
split my text in four-grams ,
my text in four-grams , five-grams
text in four-grams , five-grams or
in four-grams , five-grams or even
four-grams , five-grams or even hundred-grams

puedes encontrar más detalles en este blog

Después de unos siete años, aquí hay una respuesta más elegante usando collections.deque:

def ngrams(words, n):
    d = collections.deque(maxlen=n)
    d.extend(words[:n])
    words = words[n:]
    for window, word in zip(itertools.cycle((d,)), words):
        print(' '.join(window))
        d.append(word)

words = ['I', 'am', 'become', 'death,', 'the', 'destroyer', 'of', 'worlds']

Salida:

In [15]: ngrams(words, 3)                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
I am become
am become death,
become death, the
death, the destroyer
the destroyer of

In [16]: ngrams(words, 4)                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
I am become death,
am become death, the
become death, the destroyer
death, the destroyer of

In [17]: ngrams(words, 1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
I
am
become
death,
the
destroyer
of

In [18]: ngrams(words, 2)                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
I am
am become
become death,
death, the
the destroyer
destroyer of

Si desea una solución iteradora pura para cadenas grandes con uso constante de memoria:

from typing import Iterable  
import itertools

def ngrams_iter(input: str, ngram_size: int, token_regex=r"[^\s]+") -> Iterable[str]:
    input_iters = [ 
        map(lambda m: m.group(0), re.finditer(token_regex, input)) 
        for n in range(ngram_size) 
    ]
    # Skip first words
    for n in range(1, ngram_size): list(map(next, input_iters[n:]))  

    output_iter = itertools.starmap( 
        lambda *args: " ".join(args),  
        zip(*input_iters) 
    ) 
    return output_iter

Prueba:

input = "If you want a pure iterator solution for large strings with constant memory usage"
list(ngrams_iter(input, 5))

Salida:

['If you want a pure',
 'you want a pure iterator',
 'want a pure iterator solution',
 'a pure iterator solution for',
 'pure iterator solution for large',
 'iterator solution for large strings',
 'solution for large strings with',
 'for large strings with constant',
 'large strings with constant memory',
 'strings with constant memory usage']