¿Dónde está mi valor?

20

Mi jefe ahora quiere que implemente un mecanismo que le permita buscar un elemento en una matriz y le proporcione los índices / índices donde se produce ese valor.

Tu tarea:

Escriba un programa o función que reciba una matriz y un valor (String, Integer, Float o Boolean) y devuelva los índices de la matriz en la que se produce el valor (0 o 1 indexado, lo que prefiera). Si el valor no está en la matriz, devuelva una matriz vacía.

Entrada:

Una matriz A y un valor V, que pueden o no estar presentes en A.

Salida:

Una matriz que contiene el (los) índice (s) en los que ocurre V en A o, si V no ocurre en A, una matriz vacía.

Casos de prueba:

Tenga en cuenta que los casos de prueba están basados ​​en 0.

12, [12,14,14,2,"Hello World!",3,12,12]         -> [0,6,7]
"Hello World", ["Hi", "Hi World!", 12,2,3,True] -> []
"a", ["A",True,False,"aa","a"]                  -> [4]
12, [12,"12",12]                                -> [0,2]

Puntuación:

Este es el , por lo que gana la puntuación más baja en bytes.

Gryphon - Restablece a Monica
fuente
1
¿Podemos suponer que la matriz dada solo tiene uno de esos tipos (es decir, no matrices con tipos mixtos) ya que muchos idiomas no admiten matrices o listas con más de un tipo.
flawr
1
Claro, @flawr. Puede suponer que la matriz solo consistirá en valores del mismo tipo que el valor a verificar, si su idioma lo requiere.
Gryphon - Restablece a Mónica el
2
Todos sus arreglos son 1D. ¿Suposición?
Adám
1
@KevinCruijssen Me refería a la matriz a buscar. Podría ser multi-D.
Adám
1
Bueno. ¡Y me sorprende que aún no haya habido un idioma que pueda hacerlo en 1 byte!
Zacharý

Respuestas:

10

Pyth , 2 bytes

0 indexado.

xE

Pruébalo en línea!o marque todos los casos de prueba


Explicación

xEQ  - Full Program. Takes Input from standard input. Q means evaluated input and is implicit at the end of the program.

x   - Get all the indexes of x in y
 E  - Evaluated Input #2 - The value
  Q - The list - Evaluated Input #1
Sr. Xcoder
fuente
Se supone que debe devolver todos los sucesos, no solo el primero.
Erik the Outgolfer
@EriktheOutgolfer Fijo. Solo tómalos en orden inverso.
Sr. Xcoder
1
Pyth es definitivamente la mejor herramienta para el trabajo: P
Mr. Xcoder
7

MATL , 2 bytes

mf

El mconsume dos argumentos y comprueba cada elemento de la matriz si es igual al otro argumento,f devuelve los índices de las entradas Truthy de una matriz.

Pruébalo en línea!

falla
fuente
No parece funcionar para los casos de prueba propuestos, lo mismo para la solución Octave.
Cinaski el
Debería usar en ismemberlugar de =manejar adecuadamente las matrices de cadenas. mf
Suever
@LuisMendo No necesitamos considerar entradas mixtas, ¡consulte la aclaración de OP!
flawr
@flawr Oh, ¿por qué es eso solo en un comentario y no en el texto del desafío? : - /
Luis Mendo
Tendrías que preguntarle al OP, no a mí :)
error
7

Python 3 , 45 bytes

-3 bytes gracias a @EriktheOutgolfer y @Chris_Rands

lambda y,x:[i for i,j in enumerate(x)if j==y]

Banco de pruebas.

Hoy aprendí enumerate(x) == zip(range(len(x)),x).


Python 3 , 47 bytes

lambda n,l:[x for x in range(len(l))if l[x]==n]

Pruébalo en línea! o marque todos los casos de prueba

Sr. Xcoder
fuente
Úselo enumerate()para bajarlo un par de bytes
Chris_Rands
@Chris_Rands Terminó siendo más largo.
Sr. Xcoder
3
lambda n,l:[x for x,y in enumerate(l)if y==n]
Erik the Outgolfer
Quise decir lo que dijo @EriktheOutgolfer
Chris_Rands
1
@JonathanAllan Corregido.
Sr. Xcoder
6

R (+ pryr), 20 bytes

pryr::f(which(a==b))

Que evalúa la función

function (a, b) 
which(a == b)

Donde apuede ser el valor a buscar y bel vector, o al revés. Cuando se le presentan dos vectores de longitudes desiguales (un solo valor cuenta como un vector de longitud 1 en R), R envolverá el más corto para que coincida con la longitud del más largo. Luego se verifica la igualdad. Esto genera un vector lógico. whichproporciona los índices donde este vector es verdadero.

Pruébalo en línea!

JAD
fuente
6

JavaScript, 39 bytes

e=>a=>[...a.keys()].filter(i=>a[i]===e)

f=
e=>a=>[...a.keys()].filter(i=>a[i]===e)

console.log(f(12)([12,14,14,2,"Hello World!",3,12,12]));
console.log(f("Hello World")(["Hi", "Hi World!", 12,2,3,true]));
console.log(f("a")(["A",true,false,"aa","a"])); 
console.log(f(12)([12,14,14,2,"Hello World!",3,12,'12']));

Es posible que el fragmento anterior no funcione en todos los navegadores, así que aquí hay un enlace TIO .

Cristian Lupascu
fuente
6

JavaScript (ES6), 44 43 bytes

Tachado 44 sigue siendo regular 44; (

v=>a=>a.map((x,i)=>x===v&&++i).filter(x=>x)

Guardado 1 bytes gracias a @Arnauld

let f=
v=>a=>a.map((x,i)=>x===v&&++i).filter(x=>x)
;

console.log(f(12)([12,14,14,2,"Hello World!",3,12,12]));         // => [1,7,8]
console.log(f("Hello World")(["Hi", "Hi World!", 12,2,3,true])); // => []
console.log(f("a")(["A",true,false,"aa","a"]));                  // => [5]

Johan Karlsson
fuente
¿Puedes hacer ===un normal ==por un byte menos? Se me ocurrió literalmente lo mismo, nombres de variables y todo jaja.
kamoroso94
44
===es necesario distinguir 12de"12"
Christoph
1
@ kamoroso94 no, aquí está el por qué.
Pureferret
5

05AB1E , 4 bytes

QāsÏ

Pruébalo en línea!

1 indexado.

Erik el Outgolfer
fuente
Creo que los dos se equivocan con las entradas de: 12y [12,'12'], a menos que él diga que es frío para los idiomas que realmente no escriben tipos concretos, no les importan los tipos.
Urna de pulpo mágico
De hecho, creo que 12'12'en 05AB1E porque a veces se comportan de manera diferente ... aunque no estoy seguro de si hay alguna prueba de igualdad que pueda soportar tal cosa.
Erik the Outgolfer
Si quisiéramos probar su validez entera, nuestras respuestas serían como 60 bytes usando is_alpha (a)y is_number (d), pero supongo que podemos suponer que las nuestras son válidas hasta que se indique lo contrario.
Urna mágica del pulpo
5

C#, 88 72 bytes

using System.Linq;a=>o=>a.Select((i,n)=>o.Equals(i)?n:-1).Where(n=>n>=0)

Saved 16 bytes thanks to @LiefdeWen.

Try it online!

TheLethalCoder
fuente
Amazing, I was still trying to figure out why i==o doesn't work.
LiefdeWen
3
@LiefdeWen Boxed value types.
TheLethalCoder
72 bytes using System.Linq;a=>b=>a.Select((x,i)=>x.Equals(b)?i:-1).Where(x=>x>=0)
LiefdeWen
@LiefdeWen Nice one, I wouldn't have thought of switching it around.
TheLethalCoder
You can save a lot :) : tio.run/…
digEmAll
5

Jelly, 3 bytes

⁼€T

Try it online!

-1 thanks to Mr. Xcoder. (dyadic chains)

Erik the Outgolfer
fuente
1
Nice one. I am surprised Jelly does not have a pure built-in, like Pyth does.
Mr. Xcoder
@Mr.Xcoder I think most don't.
Erik the Outgolfer
The irony of dyadic chains :)
Mr. Xcoder
3

Haskell, 41 39 bytes

v!l=fst<$>(filter((==v).snd)$zip[1..]l)

Try it online!

Saved two bytes thanks to @flawr

Haskell is statically typed, so I had to use a little workaround to run the test cases.

jferard
fuente
You don't need your workaround anymore, see the comment of the OP.
flawr
1
Also define a operator v#l=... instead of f v l=..., will save you two bytes:)
flawr
@flawr I had the idea of v!l=..., but didn't kow if it was accepted. I'll edit the answer. Thanks!
jferard
1
Using map on some filter expression is often an indicator that a list comprehension might be shorter: v!l=[i|(i,x)<-zip[1..]l,x==v].
Laikoni
There is also a builtin, but unfortunately it is longer than Laikionis suggestion:)
flawr
3

Husk, 5 bytes

`fNm=

Try it online! 1-indexed.

Explanation

       -- implicitly input a value v and a list L
   m=  -- map "equals v" over the list L, resulting in a list of truthy and falsy values
`fN    -- filter the natural numbers N by discarding the numbers at falsy positions 
          and keeping the ones at truthy positions
Laikoni
fuente
Does this work for arrays with strings, though?
officialaimm
1
@officialaimm It works for lists containing only strings: Try it online! Lists of mixed types are not supported by Haskell and thus by Husk, but OP allowed this explicitly in the comments.
Laikoni
Is there a documentation of Husk?
flawr
@flawr Yes, it's in the wiki on the github page: github.com/barbuz/Husk/wiki
Laikoni
@flawr If you have questions about the docs of Husk in general, join us in the chatroom!
Zgarb
3

Ruby, 46 40 39 bytes

->e,a{i=-1;a.map{|x|i+=1;x==e&&i}-[!1]}

Saved 7 bytes!!! thanks to Eric Duminil.

Try it online.

Cristian Lupascu
fuente
-1 byte with !1 for false.
Eric Duminil
3

Ruby, 38 bytes

->e,a{a.each_index.select{|x|a[x]==e}}

Try it online!

Idva
fuente
2
Welcome to PPCG!
Martin Ender
3

Google Sheets, 101 bytes

=IfError(Join(",",Filter(Column(Offset(A1,0,0,1,Counta(Split(B1,",")))),Exact(Split(B1,","),A1))),"")

Value V in A1 and array A in B1 with each entry separated by a comma. Null entires are not allowed (row 5 below shows what happens).

Result

Explanation:

Offset(A1,0,0,1,Counta(Split(B1,","))) returns a range that is one row tall and as many columns wide as there are entries in A1.

=IfError(Join(",",Filter(Column(~),Exact(Split(B1,","),A1))),"") filters the column numbers of that range based on whether or not the value in A1 is exactly each of the values in B1 and concatenates them all in a comma-delineated list.

Engineer Toast
fuente
3

Clojure, 40 bytes

First attempt at code golf.

keep-indexed maps a function over a collection here, passing the current index into the callback and yielding any non-nil return values.

(fn[a b](keep-indexed #(if(= %2 a)%1)b))

Try it online!

Devo
fuente
3

APL (Dyalog Unicode), 2 bytesSBCS

Takes item to look for as left argument (must be scalar to find an item of the lookup array rather than a subarray) and the lookup array (which may have up to 15 dimensions) as right argument. Returns list of indices, each of which may has as many elements as the number of dimensions in the lookup array.

⍸⍷

Try it online!

ɩndices where

 found

Adám
fuente
I was about to say it ties Pyth, but you know... Unicode. Wouldn't this be 2 bytes in APL Dyalog Classic (since it uses SBCS)?
Mr. Xcoder
@Mr.Xcoder isn't in the character set. Still, since Dyalog uses way less than 256 unique chars, it could have been a single byte. When we add new glyphs, we refrain from changing the character set so that backwards compatibility is maintained.
Adám
Ah, Thanks! (I have no idea how APL / Dyalog works)
Mr. Xcoder
@Mr.Xcoder APL is a commercial language (not a golfing language), so Dyalog have certain obligations to existing subscribers.
Adám
APL isn't a golfing language, but there do exist open-source APL implementations (ngn and GNU).
Zacharý
2

Batch, 86 bytes

@set i=0
:g
@if "%~2"=="" exit/b
@if %1==%2 echo %i%
@set/ai+=1
@shift/2
@goto g

Takes input as command line parameters (value then the array elements as separate parameters). Note: String quoting is considered part of the match e.g. "1" won't equal 1 (would cost 6 bytes).

Neil
fuente
2

Python 2, 49 bytes

lambda l,v:filter(lambda i:l[i]==v,range(len(l)))

Try it online!

Not short enough, but I thought it was cool. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

totallyhuman
fuente
2

Perl 5, 28 bytes

sub{grep$_[$_]eq$_[0],1..@_}

Try it online!

The output is 1-indexed.
An anonymous function is quite unusual for Perl, but it happens to be the shortest I could think of. grep ..., 1 .. @_ iterates over the indexes of the input array (actually it goes one cell beyond the last, but it doesn't matter), keeping only the index that satisfy $_[$_]eq$_[0], ie. the ones where the value of the element ($_[$_]) is the same as the value we need to keep ($_[0]).


Slightly longer (31 bytes (30 + -l flag)), but as a full program:

$@=<>;$@eq$_&&print$.-1while<>

Try it online!

Dada
fuente
2

Haskell, 37 33 bytes

import Data.List
findIndices.(==)

Thanks @Laikoni for -4 bytes!

Try it online!

flawr
fuente
Pointfree is shorter: findIndices.(==)
Laikoni
Oh right, that is even more pointfree, thanks=)
flawr
1
Why not elemIndices?
nimi
2

Java 8, 146 113 112 111 110 108 bytes

import java.util.*;l->o->{List r=new Stack();for(int i;(i=l.indexOf(o))>-1;l.set(i,null))r.add(i);return r;}

-2 bytes thanks to @TAsk by using Vector instead of ArrayList.
-1 byte by using Stack instead of Vector.
-2 bytes thanks to @Jakob by inputting a ArrayList instead of an array.

0-indexed

Explanation:

Try it here.

import java.util.*;    // Required import for Vector and Vector
l->o->{                // Method with List and Object parameters
  List r=new Stack();  //  Result-list
  for(int i;(i=l.indexOf(o))>=-1;
                       //  Loop as long as we can find the object in the list
    l.set(i,null))     //   After every iteration, remove the found item from the list
      r.add(i);        //    Add the index to the result-list
                       //  End of loop (implicit / single-line body)
  return r;            //  Return the result-List
}                      // End of method
Kevin Cruijssen
fuente
1
Cool! If I am not wrong Vector may save few bytes. :)
CoderCroc
1
@TAsk Thanks! Need to remember that one. I use List+ArrayList pretty often.
Kevin Cruijssen
1
List r=new Vector(); will work, too.
CoderCroc
1
You can save 1 byte by taking a list instead: TIO. Seems like a small enough change not to merit a separate answer.
Jakob
The change breaks searching for null, but that's fine.
Jakob
1

05AB1E, 4 bytes

Qƶ0K

Try it online!

It is 1-indexed, as shown below:

IN A-#------------------------> [2,3,3,3,4]
IN B-#------------------------> 3
-----#------------------------+-----------------
Q    # Vectorized equivalence | [0,1,1,1,0]
 ƶ   # Lift by index          | [0,2,3,4,0]
  0K # Remove zeros           | [2,3,4]
Magic Octopus Urn
fuente
1

Mathematica, 12 bytes

Position@##&

1-Indexed

input [Array,Value]

[{12, 14, 14, 2, "Hello World!", 3, 12, 12}, 12]

output

{{1}, {7}, {8}}

J42161217
fuente
Why not just Position?
hftf
1

Haskell, 29 bytes

e#l=[i|(i,h)<-zip[0..]l,h==e]    

Try it online!

nimi
fuente
Does that work with the heterogeneous input cases? (Mixtures of integers, strings, a "true" value, etc).
Kaz
@Kaz: no, it doesn't. It's polymorphic and works for every type where equality is defined for, but all list elements have to be of the same type. According to a comment in the OP that's enough.
nimi
1

Japt, 9 bytes

mȶV©YÄÃf

1-indexed.

Japt input doesn't support booleans, so they have been replaced with 0 and 1 in the test cases.

Try it online! with the -Q flag to format the array output.

0-indexed Solution, 11 bytes

l o f@gX ¶V

Try it online!

Justin Mariner
fuente
One of the few times rather than ¥ comes in handy :P I was thinking of doing something along the lines of m@Y*(X¶V} f, but I hadn't realized that wouldn't work for index 0. 1-indexing is clever...
ETHproductions
1

Perl 6, 21 bytes

{grep :k,*===$^v,@^z}

Try it online!

The :k adverb to grep tells it to return the matching keys (indices) of the input sequence that match the predicate * === $^v.

If strings and numbers were considered equivalent, one could use a grep predicate of just $^v instead of * === $^v.

Sean
fuente
eqv might be better than === depending on what you want to consider equivalent values.
Brad Gilbert b2gills
1

Common Lisp, 66 bytes

(lambda(x s)(loop as i in s as j from 0 when(equal i x)collect j))

Try it online!

Renzo
fuente
1

TXR Lisp, 26 bytes

(op where(op equal @@1)@2)

In other words, "Where is argument 2 equal to argument 1?"

Run:

1> (op where(op equal @@1) @2)
#<interpreted fun: lambda (#:arg-01-0166 #:arg-02-0167 . #:rest-0165)>
2> [*1 12 #(12 14 14 2 "Hello world!" 3 12 12)]
(0 6 7)
3> [*1 "Hello World" #("Hi" "Hi world!" 12 2 3 t)]
nil
Kaz
fuente
1

Clojure, 39 38 bytes

#(filter(comp #{%2}%)(range(count %)))

A bit obscure :) The first input argument is a vec of values and the second one is the searched value. % maps indexes to values, and the set #{%2} returns truthy (the input argument %2) or falsy nil for that value. comp composes these together.

NikoNyrh
fuente
1

C 340 362 166 115 Bytes

Hello all. My first time here. I figured since I enjoy (attempting) to write optimized code I may as well give this a try.

@Rodney - ~39 bytes from the includes

@Zacharý - 7 bytes with implicit typing

0-indexed.

How to Run:

As per @Arnolds suggestion, the program takes arguments in a much more C friendly manner. This let me reduce the size of the file by a little more than half.

The arguments should be passed in the following order value [element1 ...] where braces indicate optional arguments

You may or may not have to add escaped quotes to any strings that are provided in order to satisfy the condition of 12 != "12". On my system the this can be done in the following manner

prog-name.exe 12 3 "Hello" 12 4 "12"
Returns [2,4]     < This is incorrect

prog-name.exe 12 3 "\"Hello\"" 12 4 "\"12\""
Returns [2]       < Correct

golfed

#define P printf(
b=0;main(int c,char**v){P"[");for(--c;c-1;c--)b|=strcmp(v[1],v[c])?0:P b?",%i":"%i",c-2);P"]");}

ungolfed

#define P printf(

//Implicit only works in global(I totally knew this after almost 4 years of C :P)
b = 0;
main(int c,char**v)
{

    P"[");

    //match loop
    //b is used to determine if this is the first iteration. it can be assumed that printf will always return >0
    //subract two from c to get correct index number of match
    for(--c; c-1; c--)
        b |= strcmp(v[1], v[c]) ? 0 : P b ? ",%i" : "%i", c-2);

    P"]");

    return 0;
}
Marcos
fuente
1
Welcome to the site. I notice you have a lot of extra whitespace. Particularly around operators i = 0. These can be removed. I suggest playing around with the whitespace a bit.
Wheat Wizard
With the way you handle the list, a first argument of ,12 and second argument of [12,14,14,2,"Hello World!",3,12,12] prints [5,6] which is technically incorrect.
Arnold Palmer
@ArnoldPalmer I updated the code to make it a little more verbose at detecting data types. However, since C doesn't have all the fancy type conversion such as JavaScript, it is still vulnerable to having a comma in a 'number' type. I pretty much just left it assuming correctly formatted input.
Marcos
@Marcos There's a chance you may be able to take each value of the array as it's own command line argument. I don't golf in C ever, so not quite sure what the rules are, but it doesn't seem unreasonable to me that you'd be allowed to do that. Especially since accepting the array as a list leaves you vulnerable to this problem. Also, you still have a bit of white space in your golfed code. You don't need the spaces on the #include statements, strstr(h+i,n)-h ==i has an extra space, and you can do return-1 instead of return -1.
Arnold Palmer
are implicit declarations allowed? I think you can ditch the #include statements
Rodney